Back to Main page

they wanted to maintain control over the narrative surrounding the origin of SARS-CoV-2




"As a virologist, this wasn't anything like SARS or MERS because they never learned how to transmit human to human. I felt this virus was too infectious for humans; there was a lot of evidence that the lab published in 2014 that they put the ACE2 receptor into humanized mice so it could infect human tissue. I didn't know I was excluded; I didn't know there was a February 1st conference call until the FOIA came out with the emails, and I was quite upset as the CDC director that I was excluded... they came up with a single narrative which I will argue is antithetical to science."

9 Million reasons to do a 180:
January 31, 2020: "Features (potentially) look engineered," and the genome is inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory."

February 4, 2020 (After Speaking w/ Fauci): "The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered ... and that is demonstrably false.

 He then summed up the whole story for his colleagues. “Three days after they say it came from a lab, they changed their position and the only intervening event is a conference call with Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins, again a call that Mr. Redfield was not allowed to be on … and then three months later, shazam, they get $9 million bucks from Dr. Fauci. Well, isn’t that something.

Dr. Redfield: "When when you have a group of people that decide there can only be one point of view, that's problematic. And I'll keep saying it's antithetical to science. And unfortunately, that's what they did."

Story source: Western Journal

Back to Main page